found_drama


Turn it upside down.


    #2009 Goals: Q2 round-up

    April through June: gone as quick as they came. Shall we check in on the goals I set for myself? I think we shall.

    1. Write at least three hours per week. To echo my sentiments from last quarter: not a banner year. I have hardly scratched out a few incoherent words let alone incoherent sentences.  The long litany of excuses only grows but the conclusion remains the same:  I am not forcing myself to sit down and do this.  But maybe the fact that the word “force” even enters the equation is proof enough that ‘09 is not “my” year?  We shall see.  If ‘07 is any indication of how a year can swing around dramatically…
      2009 Annual Writing Goal as of Q2
    2. Read 36 new books during 2009. Still a bit behind the target pace but picking up steam:
      2009 Reading Goal as of Q2
      Tracking the ‘09 reading list on Goodreads.com with the  ”2009” tag/bookshelf1.  Also exciting is that I’ve read most of the books from my specific hit list for the year:
      2009's Specific Books as if Q2
      Remaining on that list:  An Obedient Father, Dhalgren, Foucault’s Pendulum, Theodore Rex (Modern Library Paperbacks), and Nights at the Circus2.
    3. Walk at least 10 miles every week. I have on and off days…
      2009 Walking Goal as of Q2
      …though apparently most off days3?  And now that we’re moving out to Essex, I fear this may drop a bit more.
    4. Climb at least once each week. Doing just fine here, thanks:
      2009 Climbing Goal as of Q2
    5. Finish up my Ortho theme for WordPress. Been done.
    6. Get outside more often. Uh…?  It’s Spring/Summer time now.  Thanks for asking.  See you out there…

    At the year’s half-way mark, where shall we say I have landed?



    1. Mind your step though.  It’s a bit clutted with kids books that don’t really count. []
    2. These links head out to Amazon.com Affiliate links, BTW.  In case you wanted to help a guy out. []
    3. Note: technically speaking, I made this graph with a few days to spare left in June.  So I might still have eeked out just enough mileage?  The Q3 round-up should have some more official numbers. []

    #Linkdump for June 30th


    #last moments as Burlington residents

    Games we play... (2)


    #Linkdump for June 29th


    #adding 300 words

    Re my own writing:  this is kind of vindicating and kind of disheartening:

    scalzi-300-words


    #the Tao of LOL

    A friend asked me today:  ”On IM, when you type ‘haha’, does that imply that you actually laughed?”

    I answered immediately:  no.

    The “haha” and “hehe” strings imply that you got the joke, that you’re reading and comprehending the humor, that you believe the preceding statement is funny — but it doesn’t necessarily mean that you laughed.

    Leading to the follow-up:  ”What about ‘LOL’?”

    Which, naturally, means that you did in fact laugh out loud.  ”LOL” is a step up from a “hehe” or a “haha”.  It ought to be a rare and coveted event.  If you can eek out an LOL from someone, you’ve done well.

    This led to a couple of brief asides about the hierarchy of online laughter:

    the Tao of LOL: the hierarchy of online laughter

    Observe:  First the “heh” is a modicum of laughter; the online equivalent of the wry smile or the eye-roll at some lame pun.  ”Heh” says:  I get it but you’ll need to do better. Then there are the siblings “haha” and “hehe”.  Both are a bit ambiguous since either could be a polite gesture (I like you and that was funny but not LOL-worthy) or an indication of genuine amusement.  Neither should be taken as offensive but neither should be interpreted as full-on actual laughter.  Next are the bastard cousins “muwahaha” and “bwahaha”.  ”Muwahaha” is the evil one — that’s reserved for when you’re laughing at someone’s expense.  ”Bwahaha” is a more uncontrollable laughter — the online equivalent of shooting milk out your nose.  But nothing can compare to the rate and coveted “LOL”:  laughing-out-loud is when you have arrived and caused someone to physically make an ass out of him or herself by laughing at your disembodied wit.

    Everything else is just derivative.


    #Worldmakers

    Worldmakers, edited by Gardner DozoisArranged chronologically from 1955 through 2001, Dozois’ anthology Worldmakers: SF Adventures in Terraforming, is a tightly-themed collection of science fiction shorts. It’s a good overview of the terraforming subject’s treatment within the genre but the anthology seems to lack any stand-out stories — there are no great masterpieces in here. Which is not to say that it’s not an enjoyable collection. I mostly picked it up for research purposes (re terraforming and first contact1) but found it to be a good bed-side item. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of this collection is that, because it is arranged chronologically, you get a sense of how views of terraforming have evolved within the genre over time — what are the in vogue technologies? how central is terraforming to the story? what sorts of politics are involved?

    As for the computed average of my ratings on the individual stories themselves (out to four decimal places), Worldmakers scores: 3.2250

    Read the rest of this entry »



    1. Though there’s barely any first-contact subject matter in here at all. []

    #haiku movie review: Aguirre: The Wrath of God

    descend from Andes
    descend to utter madness
    wrestle with monkeys

    Great film.  Stunning.  Epic.  Masterfully shot.  Surreal.  Insert more superlatives here.

    However, when your primary film-selection criterion for the evening is “which one is shortest?” — well, this one may leave your jaw unpleasantly unhinged.  Bewildering.

    Will watch again.  When I’m more serious about it.


    #Happy Birthday to H.

    A day late here but what the hell… Happy birthday, Holden.

    Holden: the first year (redux)

    Above? That’s a mosaic of his one-per-day portraits for the first year. It begins June 22, 2008 and goes through June 22, 2009. We managed to only miss one day through the whole mess, too.


    #Linkdump for June 23rd




    Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.