<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacWorld scorecard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.founddrama.net/2006/01/macworld-scorecard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.founddrama.net/2006/01/macworld-scorecard/</link>
	<description>getOblique();</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Macworld &#8216;07 Predictions at found_drama</title>
		<link>http://blog.founddrama.net/2006/01/macworld-scorecard/comment-page-1/#comment-9368</link>
		<dc:creator>Macworld &#8216;07 Predictions at found_drama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.founddrama.net/2006/01/macworld-scorecard/#comment-9368</guid>
		<description>[...] Watch this space for our scorecard on Tuesday or Wednesday&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Watch this space for our scorecard on Tuesday or Wednesday&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: found_drama</title>
		<link>http://blog.founddrama.net/2006/01/macworld-scorecard/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>found_drama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.founddrama.net/2006/01/macworld-scorecard/#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Ha!  Yeah.  I've been trying to follow *SPEC benchmark controversy as closely as I can.  Still not sure I fully understand what it's all about.  I'll agree it has an acrid reek about it.

Remember kids: Quality is version 1.0.1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  Yeah.  I&#8217;ve been trying to follow *SPEC benchmark controversy as closely as I can.  Still not sure I fully understand what it&#8217;s all about.  I&#8217;ll agree it has an acrid reek about it.</p>
<p>Remember kids: Quality is version 1.0.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.founddrama.net/2006/01/macworld-scorecard/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.founddrama.net/2006/01/macworld-scorecard/#comment-570</guid>
		<description>I have to say, I am not very impressed with the SuperHappyMacABook Pro (or whatever it's called).  4-5 times faster?  Statements like that always set off alarms in my head.  No dual-layered DVD writing?  Ouch.  There is one positive though... Windows XP can NEVER run on it.  ;)
-m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I am not very impressed with the SuperHappyMacABook Pro (or whatever it&#8217;s called).  4-5 times faster?  Statements like that always set off alarms in my head.  No dual-layered DVD writing?  Ouch.  There is one positive though&#8230; Windows XP can NEVER run on it.  <img src='http://blog.founddrama.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
-m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
