PA says “no” to ID
¶ by Rob FrieselVia Neil Gaiman: The 139 page PDF draft of Judge Jones’ ruling in Kitzmiller et al. vs. Dover Area School District et al.
This word substitution is telling, significant, and reveals that a purposeful change of words was effected without any corresponding change in content, which directly refutes FTE’s argument that by merely disregarding the words “creation” and “creationism,” FTE expressly rejected creationism in Pandas.
Landmark decision, if you ask me. Go PA! As Gaiman says: The “why this is not an activist decision by an activist judge” bit on page 137 is terrific, although you’re best off getting there the hard way, starting at page 1… Worth it, indeed.
Leave a Reply