In the realm of technical, programming-related, computer science-type books, The Joy of Clojure is a bit of an oddity. And this is a very good thing.
WHAT THE BOOK IS NOT: The Joy of Clojure is not a beginner’s introduction to the language. The Joy of Clojure is not a glorified appendix of methods and syntax. The Joy of Clojure is not a “cookbook” or a “how-to” or an “FAQ”. The Joy of Clojure is not an explanation on how to shoe-horn your Java code into (some (graceful [parenthetical syntax])). The Joy of Clojure is not a dry or sterile technical manual.
WHAT THE BOOK IS: The Joy of Clojure is as much a philosophical text as it is a survey of the language. The Joy of Clojure embraces the language’s own flexible nature and describes itself in that way. The Joy of Clojure has a sense of humor. The Joy of Clojure expects a little work from you (but is willing to lend a hand along the way). The Joy of Clojure respects the baggage that you bring from your other programming languages, but expects you to check those bags at the door. The Joy of Clojure wants to make you a better programmer, not a Clojure programmer.
I would absolutely recommend this to anyone I know that had an interest in Clojure and/or functional programming.
- Lisp’s syntax can be a bit off-putting to outsiders and novices… and the authors even come out and say this in the book. [↩]
- Viz., I haven’t looked at/used Lisp in probably… 10 years? [↩]
About Rob FrieselSoftware engineer by day, science fiction writer by night. Author of The PhantomJS Cookbook and a short story in Please Do Not Remove. View all posts by Rob Friesel →
4 Responses to The Joy of Clojure
As someone who finds Clojure to be a breath of fresh air, I am curious. What are some of those things that strike you as “FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG”?