found drama

get oblique

Apple vs. Teh Postal Service

by Rob Friesel

So is anyone else just plain sick and tired of this freakin’ story? To me it’s just another chapter in the s/he said s/he said po-mo mythology of who said what when why where first and whether or not it’s all that original and/or (re?)mix-worthy in the first place.

Statement one: The Postal Service’s video is just a white-tone rip-off of Kubrik’s 2001 shots to begin with. Clean-room bunny suits? Bullshit, that’s Dave’s space suit.

Statement two: They’re just bitter because their work tends to be mediocre and requires remixin’ to emerge as any kind of stand-out in the first place. (Admit it, you too gave up on Give Up after realizing that John Tejada was the reason you thought liked this band. I believe your words were: “Oh that’s what the original sounds like…?”)

Statement three: Gibbard’s statement is a fishing expedition. To see if [t]he[y] can get from Apple what [t]he[y] got from the mailman.

Additional thoughts: Now that I think of it, this really is the defining post-modern beyond-the-grave revenge of Stanley Kubrik.


UPDATE: Seems Gruber got the same impression I did re: the whole HAL9000 death scene thing.

About Rob Friesel

Software engineer by day. Science fiction writer by night. Weekend homebrewer, beer educator at Black Flannel, and Certified Cicerone. Author of The PhantomJS Cookbook and a short story in Please Do Not Remove. View all posts by Rob Friesel →

2 Responses to Apple vs. Teh Postal Service

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*