found_drama

Does it have more than 1 way to look?



    Archive for February 26th, 2008

    #Mardi Gras ‘08 follow-up

    Magic Hat is not talking about this photo but this is their float from the 2008 parade so I thought it would be appropriate hereThe most excellent folks at Magic Hat gave me a shout out in their Mardi Gras wrap-up blog post today:

    A special thanks to Rob Friesel over at found drama for letting us use one of his 2007 Mardi Gras photos for our official site. Check out the great photos he took this year.

    You’re welcome!

    For anyone in VT that didn’t make it out this year, it was a blast. Good times had by all, for sure. Next year should be awesome, as well.


    #“I just don’t get that.”

    Read Wired’s piece on the 37signals guys last night and then saw it again this morning via DF.  Haven’t looked around too much to see what others are saying but the DF emphasis seems to be on “ginned-up conflict” vs. doubled revenue in ‘07.  Coming away from the article last night, I find myself with my own mixed feelings about their approach.

    On the one hand, if you’ve created something as massively popular as Rails, the conventional wisdom is that you are in some way beholden to that project both technically and culturally.  And regardless of the technical successes and/or limitations of your platform, there is a definite case to be made for a cultural failure if that cultural figurehead is out there making hostile statements and calling everyone else a crybaby.  Doubled revenues are nice but carving out a niche island and then burning all the bridges that lead there?

    On the other, I would be a liar if I didn’t see some merit to the “fuck off” approach.  The conventional wisdom also tells you that “everyone else” is going to lean on you for answers first instead of either (a) trying to figure it out themselves or (b) making a substantive contribution.  I.e., Newton may have stood humbly on the shoulders of giants but he’s still Newton.  Not that the lads at 37signals are necessarily making Newton-level contributions to the webdev or business fields but I don’t believe that the metaphor is any less apt.

    For me, the crux of the article lies in one particular quote:

    “Someone on the outside would look at what we do and say, Let’s ratchet it up to some enterprise level,’” he argues. “I don’t want to make our software more complicated. I really don’t understand why everyone’s interested in Fortune 500 customers. I just don’t get that.”

    Suggesting that it’s about your goals and your audience.  There is a lot of pressure when you shift your focus to those enterprise deals; the stakes are higher, the scopes change — everything is different.  And if that’s not where you want to be, if you are unwilling or unprepared to go there, then by all means don’t.  Maybe it’s because you believe the Fortune 500 companies are aging dinosaurs whose times are limited.  Maybe you just don’t like wearing collared shirts to your demos and presentations.  If nothing else: if your brand and your credibility are built on values like keeping it small and always keeping the middle-finger preemptively and defensively up, well then have at it.